BYU’s new guard has said NIL was not the driving factor in his decision to transfer. Even if that isn’t the case, Drew hopes the House vs. NCAA settlement — which was recently approved and will soon allow programs to share revenue with athletes under a $20.5 million salary cap —will bring new balance to offseasons.

Over the past five years, college athletics has undergone a massive transformation, shifting from amateur ideals to a new era defined by athlete empowerment, NIL deals, and legal reckonings. On Friday,

As colleges prepare for sweeping changes tied to the NCAA's $2.8 billion NIL settlement, proposed scholarship and roster limits will dampen college opportunities for high school athletes.

Zakai Zeigler filed a lawsuit against the NCAA seeking a fifth year of eligibility to play for Tennessee. His preliminary injunction was denied.

AD Ross Bjork said Ohio State will not cut any sports teams but $18 million will be shared between football, basketball and volleyball.

Welcome to the end of amateurism—and the chaotic beginning of whatever comes next. In the wake of a landmark antitrust settlement, House v. NCAA, the college

The College Sports Commission is designed to regulate the NIL market but won’t have subpoena power to control rogue boosters.

The push from the NCAA and Power Five conferences to enact federal legislation regarding college sports is intensifying. House representatives Lisa McClain (R-Mich.)and Janelle Bynum (D-Ore.) introduced the “College Student-Athlete Protections and Opportunities through Rights,